The democrat candidates are talking about a "Buffet law", named after Warren Buffet, that sets an alternate minimum tax limit, "so that the rich will never pay less than the middle class in taxes again!"And, of course, the vast majority of democrat voters, who live off government assistance, like that idea, dreaming that there will be enough for them to have even more. (There wont be. The math proves it)
Personally, I have a different kind of "Buffet Law" - Warren Buffet hasnt paid taxes in over a decade. So of course his secretary paid more than he did. Anyone who paid at all - paid more than he did. Hell, anyone that filed paid more than he did.
Then there's Charlie Rangle. Hadnr paid his taxes in three years. He was "punished" by being made head of the committee that writes tax laws.
Then there's John Kerry and his yacht. The mooring fees (taxes) are around $4 million dollars. He keeps claiming to each state trying to collect the taxes that he's mooring in a different state, so he doesnt pay any taxes.
No, if I was writing laws, I wouldnt be worrying right now about the idjit claiming to pay less than his secretary. Id be too busy going after the hypocritical bastards demanding "the Rich" (who are less wealthy than them) "Pay their fair share" while not paying at all. And my solution would be the confiscation of all assets. People like Rangle, Kerry, Buffet, and Pelosi, who havent paid taxes for years, but demand others pay, and pay more, would have everything taken from them as punishment for not paying.
That seems fair to me, anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment