Asking the wrong crowds

Legal hispanic immigrants and native-born US citizens of hispanic descent support the repeal of obama's criminal executive orders, deportation of illegal immigrants (who, simply by being here, are committing federal felonies) and a raising of the standards for new immigrants; basically everything trump has run on the last two years.

Muslim citizens of America support trump's "extreme vetting", the moratorium on new immigrants from Islamic countries that support terrorism until we can set up that vetting, and strong action against extremist and jihadist islam; basically everything trump has campaigned on these last two years.

The only people that DO seem to have a problem are white, liberal, wealthy democrats, who claim to be "outraged" for these minority groups. Except these minority groups arent "outraged". Why should we care what a bunch of self-loathing "social justice warriors" have to say when the groups they claim to be speaking for keep saying "whitey aint speaking for me"?

Company Donations, right or wrong?

There is currently a petition going around calling for the boycott of several companies because they donated to tump's campaign. Ignored is the fact that they also donated to either hillary's pr the general DNC fund campaign, (which amounts to the same thing) and about the same amount. Thats simply how businesses work. They cant afford to piss off the winner, so they pay both sides equally. Is it right to punish them for hedging their bets?

Social Engineering and the Military

When I joined the military back in 1992, the hot issue was "dont ask, dont tell", and homosexuals were damned lucky to get that deal. Since then, we've seen women allowed to fill men's roles without having to meet the same standards (a recipe for getting men killed needlessly) the over-turning of DADT for open enlistment of gays, and all kinds of other social engineering.

Its truly hard to explain to a civilian just what and why these issues are so wrong, and have no place in the military. Its not that we hate gays, women, or any of the other lies and bullshit liberals whine against us.

Its really simple, and as usual, that makes it the hardest for others to comprehend. There are 4 great insults in military lingo; if you want to guarantee a fight, call a service member one of these: commie, nazi, hippie, or individual. Even coward isnt as bad an insult as these four. And yet, we have all these gays and women and other morons and retards that demand to be recognized, in the service, as individuals! They WANT recognition as one of the worst insults I can call them.

It would be like a group of blacks protesting, demanding that white people called them "n*gg*r", or Jews demanding kosher ham. The very fact that these women and gays are demanding this recognition is proof they have absolutely no understanding of what they are doing, what they are entering, and no business enlisting. The very mental picture matches the old Dave Chapel Show skit where the blind black man was in the KKK; these people demanding to be recognized as individuals in the military is just as f*cked up as that situation. But that was meant as comedy; this isnt. Which makes it even more sad and wrong.

theoretical versus practical

I remember an old Rodney Dangerfield movie, "Back to School". In the film, his son wants to drop out of college, thinking it's a waste of time and money, pointing out how "dad" (Dangerfield) has become a millionaire without a college degree. He makes an agreement with his son that he will go to college if his son returns.

During the film, many of the scenes are of him "schooling" (if you'll pardon the pun) the professors about how business works in the real World, versus what their books say; how debt is bad, how you have to bribe the inspectors, meet or beat union standard wages and benefits regardless of "fair wage" according to the books, and so on. Basically, what a real business has to do in the real world if it wants to keep its doors open.


Obama filled his cabinet with a good many academicians. They sold him and the country on how all these ideas would work, and work great, and make out nation better. Cash for clunkers was supposed to remove every car more than 6 years old and getting less than 17mpg. The bank bail-outs were supposed to get money to the common folk and have us spending like it was the 90s all over again. The auto industry bail-outs were supposed to have American Motors cranking out cars like it was 1950s Detroit once more. Drone warfare destroying multiple city blocks to kill one suspected terrorist was supposed to scare the rest of the middle east out of becoming terrorists. Our treating Cuba and Iran like they were decent, humane, civilized countries was supposed to turn them into exactly that. (somehow)

Its much the same way all the little kiddies on the college campus would always tell me "communism works perfectly well, in theory. No one gives it a chance" Then I'd ask if they remembered the USSR. Unsurprisingly, they'd never heard of it. They'd champion socialism, until I explained (and proved) that both Nazi Germany and Italy were socialist, that the "z" in "nazi" stood for the German word for Socialism. And it would take quite a while to get that simple truth into their heads; usually a few weeks. They would claim their theoretical pure democracy worked better than our Republic, until I explained that would mean simple majority wins, and on most things they cared about, they were a significant minority, at the national level.

Anyway......
Trump is now filling his cabinet with rich former CEOs

Just a few of obama's "not scandals"

So he's claiming he had a scandal-free 8 years....
Lets see what history says:

Operation Fast and Furious where the guns the feds intentionally had let slip into the hands of Mexican gangs were used to kill one of their own.

Then came Libya, where heavy armaments the feds secretly had passed into the hands of terrorists masquerading as rebels were used to kill the U.S. ambassador and topple a friendly government.
(Thats actually treason, btw)

Then came the seizure of telephone records of journalists critical of the administration by the Department of Justice, which secretly convinced a federal judge that talking to a whistleblower and reporting on his questionable behavior somehow involved reporters criminally in that behavior.

Then came the targeting by the IRS of conservative advocacy groups by denying them tax-exempt status (while granting to identical liberal ones) because of political affiliation.

Then came the Secret Service scandal in which dozens of agents were caught in sexual encounters on foreign trips in hotels where the president was staying -- encounters that involved the loss of laptops and itineraries and jeopardized the president’s physical safety -- and two directors lost their jobs.

Then came the Edward Snowden revelations that the government was capturing every keystroke of every person using every computer and mobile device in the United States yet was still failing to keep us safe and that a senior Obama official had lied about this under oath. And all this was done without the approval of Congress, using a secret court that rationalized its way around the Constitution.

While all this was happening, the president was secretly using drones to kill Americans and others in foreign lands -- folks never charged with crimes -- without having any oversight at all; he could just say "that guy's a terrorist. Kill him", and no one could say "no."

Also, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was exposing state secrets -- including the names and whereabouts of undercover American agents -- to friend and foe alike, and the FBI declined to recommend prosecution.

And while Clinton was under investigation, her husband, former President Bill Clinton, had a private meeting on an airport tarmac with the attorney general -- whom he had once appointed a U.S. attorney -- at which they claim they discussed their grandchildren.

We wont go into the number of terrorist attacks that he claims didnt happen, or the American citizens killed by jihadist extremists. Nor will we mention his deliberate actions to worsen race relations to the point where he could cheer on bigoted hate-groups calling for the open murder of white people (especially police) simply for the "crime" of being white.

This asshole cant leave office fast enough, and I dearly hope his records are forced open after he's thrown out so we can finally prosecute him for all the crimes he's committed.

The real problem

We keep seeing in the news "bad russians! ebul! ebuuuuul! dey haxors us! ebuuuuuuul!!!!111!!!!!"

 Excuse me for a moment, can we have a reality check, please?
1) the only people saying it's the Russians are the cowardly traitor soon to be evicted from The People's House (and not soon enough!) hill-beast the unquestionably criminal liar, and their toadies, who will parrot anything they say.

Wiki-leaks says they didnt get it from the Russians, or ANY government, but from a private citizen. And none of our spy agencies have a single shred of evidence to dispite that claim.

2) Hill-b*tch wasnt able to deny any of the emails as fake. The crimes she admits to and commits in those emails actually happened, and she could only deny it in campaign speeches, where she wasnt under oath. Everywhere else, she had to confess they were hers, they were true, and the illegal activities did happen.

And that really is the worst part of this: the democrats want to distract everyone from the fact that Comey essentially said that hill-b*tch wasnt mentally competent to stand trial; if she was, there was a list a mile long of crimes to charge her with that a first-year law student could win, and then there would be the ones that would need an experienced trial lawyer. She DID commit several counts of treason, sending aid (everything from missiles to ammo to medicine) to Taliban and Al Qaeda Forces. She did undeniably commit espionage against her country, telling secrets to foreigners and businesses for profit. She did take numerous (obscenely huge) bribes (a felony in itself), essentially selling the right to influence US national policy to foreign government officials (which could be argued as either more counts of treason  or espionage, depending on the prosecutor)

I am more angry that the US Media KNEW ALL these facts and CHOSE to hide them than I am at Russia for exposing them. Im actually grateful to Russia for doing the job that the US Media was supposed to, and exposing corruption and criminal behavior in the government.

It is truly a sad day in America when Russia is more democratic and a better protector of the rights of the people that the United States. When comparing Putin to Ojackwagon the cowardly traitorous disgrace, Putin makes a better President. The only comfort is that when history measures this "affirmative action" failure who won only because of his skin color, they will record the only good thing he did was leave.

Chicago

Since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan started 15 years ago, the city of Chicago has consistently been more dangerous and threatening to American life and safety than actually being in either (or both) war zones. Rham continues to whine and snivel the same liberal idiocies that democrats have claimed for almost 7 decades now: more summer jobs, better prevention programs for kids, blah blah blah;  hugs and slaps on the wrist while blaming society instead of putting a boot on the throat of the criminals is his continued plan to "protect" Chicago. A plan that has produced ever-increasing failure in the city that has been held by democrats for decades, and sliding into a violent hell-hole of a slum for the same length of time. Coincidence, or just a repeat of the Detroit phenomena, and proof of the inevitable destructive results of liberal policy?