The democrats are trying to stir up new faux outrage over the trump administration sending out questionnaires to the various federal departments asking to explain what they do, how they relate to the current "big ticket" issues debated during the election, and how many members of staff, what those staffers do, and why.
Routine stuff a new administration needs to know, unless it wants to:
A) make no changes at all, which is stupid. The democrats lost big-time because none of their ideas of the last 7 decades have worked at all in any positive way. You can look at Detroit, Chicago, welfare, social security; every idea of the democrats, however noble, has bankrupted whoever was supposed to run it, and produced only poverty, misery, and corruption.
Obviously not a direction an administration that hopes to be successful wants to follow.
B) Entirely gut and cut the division. Which is what the democrats are claiming the questionnaires will lead to anyway. Because they cant comprehend any7 way to succeed at anything, from properly running a government to properly running a business to properly running a computer server.
The problem for the Democrats is that the current "leadership" (if one can call it that) is a mix of brain-fried hippies and new-age socialists and communists. And they're all too mentally damaged to realize that none of the rest of America wants the corruption, misery, poverty, and suffering that socialism and communism bring. Until they can stop encouraging us to be like North Korea, Cuba, and the (former) USSR (which is FORMER for a reason) they are going to lose even more support.
Thursday, December 29, 2016
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
Is it the seriousness of the charge or the fact of guilt?
Under the obama yeas, we have repeatedly heard that it wasnt the matter of guilt or not, but the seriousness of the charge that mattered. College men for "rape", when all evidence showed she was perfectly willing until several days or even weeks later, when she found out he wasnt rich or well-connected; Republicans incarcerated for criminal wrong-doing only to have the appellate courts say there wasnt even a crime committed; The accusation that disabled veterans, christians, conservatives and republicans are terrorists of equal standing to muslim jihadists;
Yes, many innocent and good people were accused, dishonored, and insulted by an entire political party that felt that making baseless accusations, and using the law to silence opposition, in order to hold power (hmmm, Ive seen these tactics somewhere before...) was perfectly acceptable. Until it was their own that was caught.
Congressional Record hold the fact Benhgazi was allowed to happen so that Taliban and Al Qaeda forces could get the military aid there. obama and hillary knew the attacks were coming, and so stuffed the building with as much medical supplies, ammunition, rockets, missiles, and arms as they could, so that the same terrorists groups we are at war with could conveniently "steal" them. What should have been open charges of treason were swept under the rug.
Why?
hillary's emails show she was taking bribes at a quarter of a Billion (with a "B") per pay-out to sell access to her and influence of American policy by foreign nationals, and doing so for several years. A republican was imprisoned for an unproved allegation of being bribed. But the FBI didnt press charges, in spite of hillary and her staff admitting the emails are hers.
Why?
The changes to espionage laws she helped write that obama used to prosectue several people were not used when she broke them. Why not?
We have a woman who committed espionage against her country, and also committed treason, on top of many other crimes. But to her and the entirety of the Democratic Party, the only "crime" is that these facts made it to public light.
Yes, many innocent and good people were accused, dishonored, and insulted by an entire political party that felt that making baseless accusations, and using the law to silence opposition, in order to hold power (hmmm, Ive seen these tactics somewhere before...) was perfectly acceptable. Until it was their own that was caught.
Congressional Record hold the fact Benhgazi was allowed to happen so that Taliban and Al Qaeda forces could get the military aid there. obama and hillary knew the attacks were coming, and so stuffed the building with as much medical supplies, ammunition, rockets, missiles, and arms as they could, so that the same terrorists groups we are at war with could conveniently "steal" them. What should have been open charges of treason were swept under the rug.
Why?
hillary's emails show she was taking bribes at a quarter of a Billion (with a "B") per pay-out to sell access to her and influence of American policy by foreign nationals, and doing so for several years. A republican was imprisoned for an unproved allegation of being bribed. But the FBI didnt press charges, in spite of hillary and her staff admitting the emails are hers.
Why?
The changes to espionage laws she helped write that obama used to prosectue several people were not used when she broke them. Why not?
We have a woman who committed espionage against her country, and also committed treason, on top of many other crimes. But to her and the entirety of the Democratic Party, the only "crime" is that these facts made it to public light.
About that electoral college
So, the nominated electors have voted. None of the republicans changed their votes. Few of the democrats were allowed to change theirs. The state of Washington was one notable exception; 4 electors chose to break ranks and not vote for hillary.
After all the rants, hate-filled idiocy, attempted bribery (which is a felony), threats of violence and death (which are also felonies), and stupid games the dummycrats (those too stupid, dishonest, and childish to accept they lost) have been playing in their pipe-dream to steal an election, in their claims to defend and protect any elector who chose to become "faithless", to vote other than the results of the state, the dummycrats are now demanding the highest possible punishment (without trial, of course; as usual, democrats care about human and civil rights only when its convenient) for those that decided to "follow their conscience" and break faith, but by refusing to vote for the criminal hillary clinton.
After all the rants, hate-filled idiocy, attempted bribery (which is a felony), threats of violence and death (which are also felonies), and stupid games the dummycrats (those too stupid, dishonest, and childish to accept they lost) have been playing in their pipe-dream to steal an election, in their claims to defend and protect any elector who chose to become "faithless", to vote other than the results of the state, the dummycrats are now demanding the highest possible punishment (without trial, of course; as usual, democrats care about human and civil rights only when its convenient) for those that decided to "follow their conscience" and break faith, but by refusing to vote for the criminal hillary clinton.
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Skating Rinks and Government
I know I say that people are stupid. In fact, I even have my own "law":
The intelligence of a group is equal to half tyhat of the most ignorant member.
I say this because only the "dumbest" and most ignorant are usually willing to speak up and volunteer an idea when in a large mass, and then the snarky smart-asses start "adding" to whats wrong in stead of trying to improve on it.
But when I say "people are stupid", Im referring to large masses; mobs and crowds. The ability of individuals to be intelligent isnever rarely ok, not commonly in doubt. (except for Chicago drivers, but only while driving)
The reason I disagree so strongly with liberals and democrats (i know, usually one and the same) Is because they assume people are individually stupid, but in groups become "smarter" as those "more equal" (to use their terms) lead the way.
Look at an ice skating rink.
Imagine you're a government regulator and you've never seen a rink.I tell you I'm ginna flood that area with ice and then charge people money to strap sharp blades onto their feet and zip around on the ice. I will have few rules, no skill restrictions, nor age limits. Most any regulator would reject it in a New York Minute.There would be all kinds of demands for regulation; rules, safety measures, separation of ages and skills, required protection devices, etc etc etc.
However could people have possibly skated without a government to make all the rules and decisions for them? Yes, our brain-fried decrepit hippies, who went from hating the government to running (and even further corrupting) it, are the only ones snart enough to have ever figured out a smart and safe way for us to enjoy sliding on ice.
Leave people free to make their own choices and a skaters find their own path. Trust the average citizen to get by in his own life, and tell him to STFU about his neighbor's, and most our problems go away. I know its amazing and surprising, But those brilliant and educated men that wrote the Constitution and founded our Republic actually knew what they were doing.
The intelligence of a group is equal to half tyhat of the most ignorant member.
I say this because only the "dumbest" and most ignorant are usually willing to speak up and volunteer an idea when in a large mass, and then the snarky smart-asses start "adding" to whats wrong in stead of trying to improve on it.
But when I say "people are stupid", Im referring to large masses; mobs and crowds. The ability of individuals to be intelligent is
The reason I disagree so strongly with liberals and democrats (i know, usually one and the same) Is because they assume people are individually stupid, but in groups become "smarter" as those "more equal" (to use their terms) lead the way.
Look at an ice skating rink.
Imagine you're a government regulator and you've never seen a rink.I tell you I'm ginna flood that area with ice and then charge people money to strap sharp blades onto their feet and zip around on the ice. I will have few rules, no skill restrictions, nor age limits. Most any regulator would reject it in a New York Minute.There would be all kinds of demands for regulation; rules, safety measures, separation of ages and skills, required protection devices, etc etc etc.
However could people have possibly skated without a government to make all the rules and decisions for them? Yes, our brain-fried decrepit hippies, who went from hating the government to running (and even further corrupting) it, are the only ones snart enough to have ever figured out a smart and safe way for us to enjoy sliding on ice.
Leave people free to make their own choices and a skaters find their own path. Trust the average citizen to get by in his own life, and tell him to STFU about his neighbor's, and most our problems go away. I know its amazing and surprising, But those brilliant and educated men that wrote the Constitution and founded our Republic actually knew what they were doing.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Safe Spaces for conservatives on campus
The liberals are up in arms, as usual. They find it insulting and hupocritical that their fellow students, though conservative, want Safe Spaces as well. Never mind that the 14th amendment provides for equal treatment under the law; since when have liberals cared about the Constitution, or the Rights within?
But lets look back over the last year:
There have been plenty of claims by liberals of threats, and even a few spats of violence. But inevitably, either there is no corroboration (nothing but the person's word they were "threatened") or they doctored the event for publicity (the several proven cases of paying bused-in protesters to rough people up) or it was found that the liberal struck first, and then got their ass kicked.
We keep finding that, while liberals, leftists, and democrats feel threatened, no one is actually lifting a finger against them, except in self-defense.
On the other hand, we have quite a number of proven cases where these same scum sent people to the hospital for the "crime" of supporting republicans in general and trump in particular. And usually the police refused arrest afterwards, in spite of the fact it was clearly felony grade assault.
No wonder the conservative students want Safe Spaces. God knows when the next liberal will decide to attack, and under what pretext. These students, simply for having an opinion, are risking life and limb just walking the campus next to those psychotic liberals who think it is acceptable to beat someone half to death for the "crime" of disagreeing. Hell, even ISIS has better reasoning than that, though not by much.
Personally, I find it very telling that those who"feel" threatened are the ones committing the brutal violence and denying others the basic civil right of safety.
But lets look back over the last year:
There have been plenty of claims by liberals of threats, and even a few spats of violence. But inevitably, either there is no corroboration (nothing but the person's word they were "threatened") or they doctored the event for publicity (the several proven cases of paying bused-in protesters to rough people up) or it was found that the liberal struck first, and then got their ass kicked.
We keep finding that, while liberals, leftists, and democrats feel threatened, no one is actually lifting a finger against them, except in self-defense.
On the other hand, we have quite a number of proven cases where these same scum sent people to the hospital for the "crime" of supporting republicans in general and trump in particular. And usually the police refused arrest afterwards, in spite of the fact it was clearly felony grade assault.
No wonder the conservative students want Safe Spaces. God knows when the next liberal will decide to attack, and under what pretext. These students, simply for having an opinion, are risking life and limb just walking the campus next to those psychotic liberals who think it is acceptable to beat someone half to death for the "crime" of disagreeing. Hell, even ISIS has better reasoning than that, though not by much.
Personally, I find it very telling that those who"feel" threatened are the ones committing the brutal violence and denying others the basic civil right of safety.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)